What...No USA!

While in England in 1775 Dr. Benjamen Franklin was asked by a British Nobleman, what would satisfy the Americans in the Colonies and end this bitterness?

He readily replied that only a few "Re's" would do it.

Re

• store Castle William,
• call your Forces,
• pair the Damage done to Boston,
• peal your unconstitutional Acts,
• nounce your pretensions to Tax us,
• fund the duties you have extorted; after this
• quire, and
• ceive payment for the destroyed Tea, wit the voluntary grants of the Colonies, And then
• joice in a happy
• conciliation

Just think, if these few "Re's" might have be done we the United States of American might not exist today. Thank goodness for British stubbornness.

GUTS....YES....GUTS!

When we sign a document today we rarely put our lives on the line. When the men who signed the Declaration of Independence did they literally signed their lives and whatever property or money away should the War of Independence end badly for America. They put their necks in the hangman's noose should they be captured and probably the British would have sold their family into slavery or placed them in a penal colony. How many of us today would have that kind courage (guts) to do that. They knew full well what their signatures at the bottom of that page in history meant...it meant everything...including their sacred honor...something that could not be measured by monetary values. It meant the destiny of a new experiment in government...a government where the people gave the government its powers (US Constitution) and people had rights given them by God not their fellow man; this was something new and unique in the annals of human history.

How many of us would take that chance? To stand up to the world's most powerful army, Great Britain's, and say we are now free and independent from you...for these good reasons; and then back it up with their very blood if necessary. These Patriots stand in a long line of Patriots that have taken that chance, some have laid down their lives so that we, today, can celebrate that ongoing experiment in government of the people, for the people and by the people...the experiment continues. Happy Birthday America....and many more!

4th of July...USA Birthday?

Officially yes, it has been declared a holiday and our nation's birthday. Unofficially it took several more months to get the names of the needed representatives of the various colonies signed in ink on the document. They were not all in one place, Independence Hall, Philadelphia when Thomas Jefferson walked in with document in hand and signed it. In fact when the document began to circulate among the colonies for signature no one for certain was sure that nine of the colonies would in fact sign it...that is the number that was needed to make it a legal document under the Articles of Confederation. (I believe...if my memory serves me well) In the end it eventually was ratified and became an official document of the United States of America. There was a great deal of debate on the colony level whether it should be signed or not but it eventually was against all odds that were given at the time...some believed that it was signed because a higher Divine Power (God?) had changed the hearts of the men who dissented. So when you view the parades and fireworks today remember that it took a lot of time, hard work, thought, debate and according to some an act of God to make that Declaration of Independence official. Think about it today while you are having a good time.

THE SAGA OF SGT. GORSKI

After almost twenty (20) years of serving and protecting the citizens of the City of Woodstock Illinois how does the Sergeant get a simple "thanks"?.....he doesn't...he gets a complaint filed against him from the relatively new Chief of Police Robert W. Lowen Jr.who still lives in Carpentersville. It use to be if you were the Chief of a Department you not only had to live in the county but also the city; after all you, as a responsible Chief, should want to be available within minutes when duty calls. Maybe there is a different set of rules if you are this new "boss" that I don't know about...times do change. I do know that when I was on emergency room call for the two local hospitals in McHenry County I had to be available within about 20 minutes at all times...I did not always like it but duty calls and you do it...it your responsibility to the people you serve.

In any event, this last summer on or about 29 August 2007 the Chief filed a complaint asking Woodstock's Board of Fire and Police Commissioners to fire the Sergeant because the Chief accused him of abusing prescription pain medications. No mention of the in-line of duty spinal injuries he had sustained was initially mentioned as the reason for the need for legitimate, physician prescribed pain medications. The Commissioners consisted of Ronald Giordano, Lawrence Howell, and Thomas Schroeder all of Woodstock along with an attorney hired by the City of Woodstock to act as council for the Board. The Chief through his City appointed and paid attorney Anne K.E. Brophy of the Law Firm of Zukowski, Rogers, Flood and McArdle of Crystal Lake prosecuted the Chief's complaint and took over four and one-half months(4 1/2)... that's correct, 4 1/2 months. The Chief and prosecution rested their case on Feb. 4, 2008.

I can only imagine what the legal fees amounted to for just this first part of the process and wonder if the Woodstock tax payers will ever find out the dollar cost to them.We all have seen capital cases (murder trials - criminal cases)last a lot less than this civil process (non criminal) case which was still not completed.Now you might think that it would take Sergeant Gorski's attorney Thomas Loizzo,of Woodstock, at least another four and one-half months (4 1/2) to present a defense for the Sergeant. It took attorney Loizzo a few minutes and a few sentences. Mr. Loizzo respectfully requested that the Board consider a Motion for a Directed Verdict (Decision). What this means is that Sergeant Gorski and his attorney did not present a defence against what the prosecution had presented for over 4 & 1/2 months. The Sergeant and his attorney believed that the Chief and the prosecution did not meet the burden of proof to find the Sergeant guilty of the Chief's complaint and to warrant his being fired from the Woodstock Police Force.

On February 4, 2008 the Board granted the motion for a directed finding and met privately to discuss the complaint. After several minutes they rendered there finding.The Board found unanimously (3 to 0) that the Chief failed to meet his burden to establish the guilt of the Sergeant. The Board ordered that the charges against Sergeant Gorski be dismissed and no disciplinary action was recommended whatsoever. The Board also directed that all back pay with statutory interest be paid to the Sergeant and he be reinstated when he can resume his duties. To date he has not received one penny of his back pay much less any interest. Instead the costly legal saga continues with the filing of another Complaint by the Chief, this time For Administrative Review by the 22nd Judicial Circuit of McHenry County. Named now by the Chief of Police as Defendants are all the Commissioners, Ronald Giordano, Lawrence Howell and Thomas Schroeder and now new co-defendant Sergeant Steven R. Gorski. Politics and legal tactics and the alleged inability to accept no to your request for discharge from the Police Department sure make strange bed-fellows.

The hearing will be before Judge McIntyre on July 18, 2008 in her courtroom. The Saga of Sergeant Gorski who was cleared of all charges along with his empty pocketbook and the continuing legal fees of Zukowski, Rogers,Flood and McArdle will continue in that courtroom like a never ending story. Where are the tax payers of Woodstock in this equation...nowhere to be considered by City officials it seems. I can only hope and pray and that in the end justice and truth and common sense will triumph and raw power, clout, ego and deep tax payer pockets do not prevail.

RETURN TO WORK AGREEMENT...A CITY SETUP?

According to the U.S. Department of Labor, elaws - Section 9, dated September 16, 2007 a Return-to-Work Agreement (RTWA) is a written document that sets forth the expectations that the employer and the employee assistance/medical professional have of an employee who has completed mandated treatment for alcohol and or drug problems. It also sets forth consequences if the expectations are not met.

Section 9 also requires that in developing a RTWA "coordination between the employee, employer, union, Employee Assistance Program and treatment professionals" take place. It also requires that "prior notification through company policy that a RTWA would be expected as a condition of continued employment."

All of the above seems perfectly reasonable except that:

1. It presumes that the underlying primary problem was one of an alcohol or drug nature and not one of a physical nature caused by two separate in-the-line of duty injuries to the individual involved. The first being witnessed by other individuals and the second officially documented at the time of injury.
2. There also was no "coordination between the employee" and the other individuals mentioned in Section 9. He or his attorney were not included in any way in drawing up this so called RTWA.
3. Prior notification that a RTWA would be necessary as a condition of his continued employment was never given before he started his relationship with the Employee Assistance Program.

The above being dully noted it also should be noted that on review of the unilaterally created document of self destruction (RTWA) that there was NO way that the Sergeant could live up to the unilaterally created document. He signed it under alleged duress from an alleged order of the Police Chief...something to the alleged affect of "sign it or you will never return to the police department". The document was a totally "loose-loose" one for the Sergeant. You judge for yourself. The agreement states in pertinent part:

"I will not use any substance containing the (named medications). I will not use any controlled substance other than that which is prescribed by a licensed physician......." this places the Sergeant in an impossible position; if he uses said medications for control of pain he is in violation of the unilateral agreement but then the agreement goes on to say that he can if prescribed by a licensed physician. This makes absolutely no sense.

I question the judgment of the people involved in this whole process of prosecution of Sergeant Steven R . Gorski. The Board of Fire and Police Commissioners found 3 to 0 in the Sergeant's favor but the Chief and the City persist in costly further litigation at the taxpayers of Woodstock's expense. When are the citizens of Woodstock going to say STOP !!! Enough already!!!!

Need A Lawyer?

Its July 2, 2008 and I'm looking for a lawyer or law firm with experience in at least two areas: 1. Prosecuting voluntary torts
and
2. Prosecuting various civil rights violations both towards an
individual and also towards an organization or entity that by
its actions and internal policies or lack of them foster in a
covert and in some cases an overt manner civil rights abuses
towards its employees

Looking through the Yellow Pages under Lawyers Guide does not help a lot because unlike other professionals that are certified to practice in specific areas the State of Illinois does not recognize certification or specialization in any field of law except "Patent", "Trademark" and "Admiralty" law. You have to take their word that they are good at what they say they are good at....hmmmm.

If you have any insights into individuals or firms that are really good at doing what they do please let me know. I would deeply appreciate it.

Woodstock....City Divided

In unity there is strength and solidarity. In division there is weakness and individuality. It appears that some elements within the City Government and certain departments of Woodstock Illinois have chosen to take the road to weakness and individuality, where the "wants" of the one or few take precedent over the good of the many: where ego and the need to "win" overwhelms common sense and where the high cost to the taxpayer does not enter into the equation even in these hard times.

On March 7, 2008, about one month following the unanimous decision (3 to 0) of the Woodstock Board of Fire and Police Commissioners to reinstate Sergeant Steven R. Gorski and to pay him all his back pay along with interest as dictated by State statute the Police Chief Robert W. Lowen Jr. filed through his City paid attorneys, Zukowski, Rogers, Flood and McArdle in the Circuit Court of the 22nd Judicial Circuit McHenry County, Illinois a COMPLAINT IN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW against the City's own Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of Woodstock Illinois and now the Board's new co-defendant, Sergeant Steven R. Gorski. So with this filing by the Chief of Police Robert W. Lowen Jr.against the City's own Board of Fire and Police Commissioners we have a situation where the City is paying both for the Chief's attorneys and the Board's attorney. This is a very interesting use of the tax payers of Woodstock's money. Someone should ask who authorized the Chief to pursue further costly legal action in this matter: to date no one has that I know of. It seems that the only entity involved in this scenario that would come out ahead would allegedly be the firm of Zukowski, Rogers, Flood and McArdle because I am sure they will be paid promptly by the City of Woodstock.

Oh, by the way, not one penny was paid to Sergeant Gorski following the order(directive) of the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners to do so. Why would anyone now or in the future want to be on the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners if their decisions and directives are not obeyed and honored. In fact why even have a Board of Fire and Police Commissioners if its actions and decisions mean nothing and only (according to some allegedly) just rubber stamp the decisions of the Chief....obviously this time they did not...and that is why we are allegedly in this current situation. In the end however no matter how this turns out the legal fees will be paid to Zukowski, Rogers, Flood and McArdle at the tax payers expense...isn't that the way it seems to always end.

I don't know who is going to live happily ever after but I sure hope that its the Sergeant, his family and three young daughters. I am sure the City and the lawyers will continue to survive nicely.

HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE?

It took the Justice Department of the Federal Government over 5 years of legal shenanigans, delaying tactics and probably hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars of legal costs to realize that they were on the wrong road in trying to connect Mr. Steven Hatfill with the 2001 anthrax attacks. On June 27, 2008 the Justice Department agreed to pay Hatfill a settlement valued at $5.85 million just to drop a lawsuit against them. The scientist Mr. Hatfill stood his ground against the might of of Feds and won . He contended that his privacy rights were violated in the rush to solve the heinous crimes.

Some contend and allege that a similar situation (except we are not talking criminal) is brewing in the City of Woodstock's Police Department and with its Chief of Police, Robert W. Lowen Jr. and the City's own Board of Fire and Police Commissioners and now co-defendant with the Board Sergeant Steven R. Gorski. Lowen contends and alleges that the Board of Commissioners along with its experienced attorney were wrong in finding that Lowen and his City's attorneys did not make their case and present the burden of proof that was needed to make the Chief's case for dismissal. Some even allege that this further legal action of asking for administrative review was taken to lessen the trauma to the Chief's ego and alleged sense of full power and control over his department. He allegedly wants to be surrounded by team players, could that be another name for "yes" men and Sergeant Gorski is a team player for the citizens of Woodstock and his fellow officers and has been for over nineteen (19) years but perhaps not allegedly enough of a "yes" man for the Chief.

Nowhere in the City's initial argument does it mention an in the line of duty injury on two occasions to his spine or his assisting a fellow officer with a question that allegedly "ticked off" the Chief .The in-line of duty injury caused the Sergeant to use his sick days and assisting a subordinate minority female officer may have been instrumental in causing the Chief and City some further legal problems with said minority officer when I was told she allegedly filed a federal complaint against the Chief and City. When he assisted said officer it was in his capacity as her sergeant after a lawful question was asked of him.

When is the City going to realize that continuing to go down this long wrong road is only making their position more tenuous and costly....using tax payer dollars to allegedly assuage some one's feelings is the wrong way of approaching this problem.

Reminders To Woodstock Illinois City Council Members

MUNICIPAL CODE WOODSTOCK ILLINOIS



1.3.2: DEFINITIONS, GENERAL:



NEGLIGENT: The word "negligent".....imports a want of such attention to the nature of probable consequences of the act or omission as a reasonable prudent man bestows in acting in his own concern.



NUISANCE: Anything offensive or obnoxious to the health and welfare of the inhabitants of the City: or any act or thing repugnant to, or creating a hazard to, or having a detrimental effect on the property of another person or to the community.



PERSONAL PROPERTY: Includes every description of money, goods, chattels, effects, evidence of rights in action and all written instruments by which pecuniary obligation, right to title of property is created, acknowledged, transferred, increased, defeated, discharged or diminished and every right of interest therein.





1.4.1: GENERAL PENALTY:



Any person violating any provision of this Code, or any rule or regulation adopted or issued in pursuance thereof, or a provision of any code adopted herein by reference shall, unless another penalty is specifically provided, upon conviction, be fined in any sum not less than five dollar ($5.00) nor more that five hundred dollars ($500.00) or imprisoned for a term not exceeding six (6) months. Each act of violation and each day upon which a violation occurs constitutes a separate offence. (1963 Code, 1.09; amd. 1986 Code)



1.4.3: RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS



Each person concerned in the commission of an act prohibited by this Code, whether he directly commits the act, or prosecutes, counsels, aids or abets in its commission, may be prosecuted and, on conviction, is punishable as if he had directly committed such act. (1963 Code 1.08)

Freedom ....a Costly Item

Gus Philpott's article about PFC Dawid Pietrek brought back many painful but proud moments of the U.S. Marines and Navy Corpsmen and Nurses that I had the privilege and honor to take care of during the Viet Nam War. These wounded young men and Navy women nurses always were concerned about the guy or woman who may have been a buddy or friend of theirs. Some of their buddies and friends did not make it back alive. These people who I was serving had served far more than I could have ever done myself. They paid the price in lost limbs, eyes, ears and terrible scars and pain that they would carry for the rest of their lives. Sure they had their share of psychological troubles ...who wouldn't after going through all they did but they always were concerned about the other guy or gal who was going through the pain and suffering they were and that other individual did not have to be a fellow marine or sailor.



My second oldest son, Michael, now almost 40 years old had sustained very serious scalding water burns to both his feet and legs in an accident. When my wife and I would bring him to the hospital for his treatments you would think the President of the United States had arrived; they would talk to him, joke with him and do many acts of kindness to take his mind off of the sometimes painful treatments. My wife and I will never forget this. These men and women will always be Patriots not just because of their injuries and sacrifices but because of their kindness and concern about a little boy that they didn't even really know....maybe that's called love?

Lets Play....Guess Who In Woodstock Illinois?

1. May have allegedly been complicit in a Federal HIPPAA Law violation/s.


2. May have allegedly initiated a legal process based on hearsay without due diligence and appropriate initial evaluation.


3. May have allegedly violated due legal process/es.


4. May have allegedly violated the "The Illinois Uniform Peace Officers' Disciplinary Act".


5. May have allegedly disseminated private personal medical information.


6. May have allegedly violated 1.7G5 paragraph A: Regulations For Sworn Officers of the City of Woodstock Municipal Code.


7. May have allegedly violated other medical confidentiality law/s.


8. May have allegedly been in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by Retaliation and Harassment.


9. May have allegedly violated Title 18 of the United States Constitution, Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights.


10. May have allegedly violated Title 42 of the United States Constitution, Section 14141 Pattern and Practice, Discriminating Harassment.


11. May have allegedly violated Title 56: Labor and Employment, Chapter 1: Department of Labor, Subchapter b: Regulation of Working Conditions Part 360 Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act Section 360.110, paragraph g.

12. May have allegedly violated the 4th and 14th Amendments of the U.S Constitution.

Guess what person or persons may have allegedly done this.

Woodstock & PD Takes Care Of Its Own...Joke

Within the Illinois Compiled Statutes there is a division called GENERAL PROVISIONS and within it is (5 ILCS 345/) Public Employee Disability Act, commonly known as "PEDA".

Sec. 1. Disability benefit.
(a) It lists among other things that an "eligible employee" is "any full-time law enforcement officer or full-time firefighter who is .............employed......., any unit of local government granted the power to employ persons for such purposes by law."

In my humble, non-lawyer brain this would include a city like Woodstock Illinois.

(b) "Whenever an eligible employee suffers any injury in the line of duty which causes him to be unable to perform his duties, he shall continue to be paid by the employing public entity on the same basis as he was paid before the injury..."

(c) "At any time during the period for which continuing compensation is required by this act, the employing public entity may order at the expense of that entity physical or medical examinations of the injured person to determine the degree of disability."

(d) "During this period of disability, the injured person shall not be employed in any other manner....."

Now lets look back at the situation of Sergeant Steven R. Gorski, an "eligible employee" of the Woodstock Police Department for (19) nineteen years.

1. Under Section 1 (a) he is an "eligible employee".
2. Under Section 1 (b) he sustained an in the line of duty injury that was reported, documented and approved after an investigation by a Deputy Chief of Police of the City of Woodstock. This injury has resulted in his inability for him to perform his duties as a Patrol Sergeant for the City of Woodstock Police Department.
3. Under Section 1 (c) never did the employing public entity (City) have a physical exam to determine the degree of disabililty of Sergeant Gorski.
4. Under Section 1 (d) at no time during this now current period of disability was or is the Sergeant employed in any other manner.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the City of Woodstock, its Mayor, City Council, City Administrator, Director of Human Resources and Chief of Police are alledgedly NOT in compliance with 5 ILCS 345/, The Public Employee Disabiltiy Act.

Now tonight when you go to sleep you can relax and have pleasant dreams knowing that your public officials are looking out for your best interests should something happen to you while you are working for the City of Woodstock. Pleasant dreams and yes don't forget to buy plenty of private disablity insurance so your family and you can survive.

Surprise! We are here to help.

About mid-afternoon there was a knock on the front door and I was saying to myself "who the heck could that be at this time?" Well low and behold it was my youngest son Phil, his wife Molly and their two sons Joe and Jim. I opened the door and said "hi! what up? and the spontaneous response from all four was "were here to help clean up the yard, cut grass and trim the trees and plants". Wow what a pleasant surprise...they decided to come on over and help just because they love us. This was totally spontaneous...we did not expect it. So my wife and I just realized that nice things do happen and sometimes when you least expect them. Thanks Phil, Molly, Joe and Jim...you are not only family but kind and nice people.

Family

Yesterday, Sunday, June 22nd we had a family get together at our home. The "we" consisted of my first and only wife of, going on 42 years, and me. The family consisted of four out of six adult children, their husbands and wives and their children (seven) and my daughter-in-law's mom and grand mom. Now that is leaving out two other adult children, their spouses and four other grand kids. We have been, so far, blessed with eleven grandchildren. We were celebrating a late Father's Day and two late birthdays and one birthday yet to come...we don't believe in wasting time, food or money. Actually its probably because we just don't want to have to clean the house four times...get all this partying over and just clean once and feed once. Getting old you sometimes get smarter.

During the course of the get together (organized family chaos-fun) I thought were did all the almost 65 years go since I was born....obviously I then realized that those 65 years were before my very eyes...an investment in marriage, family...love...relationships and something that you can't put into words but you feel in the very core of your being.

All the other things we, my wife and I did during the course of our lives were important but were ancillary to having a family, grand kids and hopefully great grand kids. That was my insight while I went to sleep totally exhausted that night. Pleasant dreams!

Intimidation by...Deep Taxpayers Pockets in Woodstock Ill.

When the process initiated by Chief of Police, Robert W. Lowen, Jr. of Woodstock Illinois began by him filing a formal complaint against Sergeant Gorski with the City of Woodstock's Fire and Police Commission seeking his termination from the force that he served in for over 19 years I must confess I was somewhat depressed and angry that a single relatively new individual backed by a City (at least allegedly a few persons in high level positions) could allegedly con volute and change the true circumstances of a situation to serve their own self serving and financial interests respectively. The Sergeant understood that his oath of office was to the U.S. Constitution, the State, the County of McHenry and intimately with the people of Woodstock Illinois; he understood that his sworn duty was to the citizens and not to be a "team player of the Chief" and not to do things that he felt may have not been in the best interest of the citizens or his fellow officers. I guess he was just not viewed as one of "the good ol boys" that would go along with someone elses personal agenda.

My faith in the intrinsic goodness of most people was restored on February 4, 2008 when, after months of the Chief's and City's unilateral prosecution of Sergeant Gorski they, the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners, after several minutes of deliberation, found in favor of Sergeant Gorski after they were asked to consider a directed verdict (which means that Sergeant Gorski did not even present his side of the case or defend himself). They found in his favor 3 to 0 and ordered he be reinstated and all back pay with interest due him by State statute be paid immediately as possible. To date he and his family which includes three young daughters have not received a penny from the City....so much for 19 years of loyalty to the people. I've learned one thing from this fiasco and that is one individual and his backers may take the wrong path and they cannot give up because they will loose face and might fracture delicate egos. What reinforces that direction they take is that it costs them nothing....they don't pay the tab...you do the taxpayer. You pay the tab to the lawyers who think they have nothing to loose and the other individuals involved. Eventually the tab will be paid and it is usually the taxpayer who winds up paying that also...all this for something that need never have occurred.

The Chief could not accept the fact that the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners found in Sergeant Gorski's favor and filed for an Administrative Review with the 22 Judicial Circuit Court...more taxpayer dollars being spent. And the Saga of Sergeant Gorski goes on and his family and children must suffer because someone cannot accept the decision of his superiors.

The question remains: why even bother to have and fund a Board of Fire of Police Commissioners if their decision can be disobeyed by one alleged individual with someones alleged political backing? I hope that the tax payers of Woodstock get angry and upset and look into this matter that is draining their pockets and inappropriately causing severe hardship on a hard working cop's family. Someone other than me has to realize that it may be them in the cross hairs next time.

Thoughts...on Government

"The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them right away."
---Ronald Reagan

"The care of human life and happiness. . . is the first and only legitimate object of good government."
---Thomas Jefferson, "To the Republican Citizens of Washington County Maryland," March 31, 1809

"The functions of government must be readjusted from time to time to restrain the strong and protect the weak. That is the preservation of liberty itself."
---Herbert Hoover, September 17, 1935

"The government goes on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity."
---Winston Churchill, speech, November 12, 1936

"I'd rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University."
William F. Buckley, Jr.

"If the government is big enough to give you everything you want, it is big enough to take away everything you have."
---Gerald Ford

"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."
---Voltaire

"When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
---Thomas Jefferson

"Reflect on the above."
Richard W. Gorski, M.D., McHenry County Advocate, June 17, 2008

Thoughts....on Justice

"The administration of justice is the firmest pillar of government."
---George Washington, letter, 1789

"The appearance of justice is just as important as justice itself in maintaining public confidence in our judicial system."
---William Cohen

"Father, forgive them: for they know not what they do."
---Luke 23:34

"He that covereth his transgressions shall not prosper. But whoso confesseth and forsaketh them shall obtain mercy."
---Proverbs 28:13

"He who allows oppression shares the crime."
---Erasmus Darwin, The Botanic Garden, 1789

"If we are to keep our democracy there must be one commandment: Thou shalt not ration justice."
---Learned Hand

"In the state of nature, indeed, all men are born equal, but they cannot continue in this equality. Society makes them lose it, and they recover it only by the protection of the laws."
Baron de Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws, 1748

"Justice has nothing to do with expediency."
---Woodrow Wilson

"Justice is truth in action."
Benjamin Disraeli, speech, February 11, 1851

"Justice, sir, is the greatest interest of man on earth."
---Daniel Webster, September 12, 1845

"Justice. . . 'this great cement of society."
---Alexander Hamilton

"You should never have your best trousers on when you go out to fight for freedom and truth."
---Henrik Ibsen, An Enemy of the People, 1882

"Reflect on the above."
---Richard W. Gorski, M.D., McHenry County Advocate, June 17, 2008

Concealed Carry & Less Gun Control = Less Crime

In 2006 the FBI documented that in 2006 this country's total violent crime rate was 37.5 % lower than is 1991 when violent crime peaked. The two most violet forms of violent crime involving a firearm were murder and robery.

Long term trends according to the FBI reveal that violet crime remains relatively low in States where the number of guns, gun owners and Right - To - Carry Laws have risen and gun control has been reduced significantly. The FBI essentially said that crime levels have little or nothing to do with increased gun control. In 2006 the States with Right-To-Carry had lower violent crime rates, on average, compared to the rest of the country.

What is needed is criminal control, not gun control according to the facts. If a criminal knows his or her chance of being killed or wounded in committing a violent crime they will think a few times before doing the dirty deed...it might be their last. Now that is using a gun to control crime.

Woodstock Illinois Sergeants....join Union?

When I first came to Woodstock in 1975 and opened my medical office on Blakely Street behind the old hospital and next to the high school the concept of joining a labor union was a very foreign idea to most of the people who worked in Woodstock, especially its police officers who worked the streets day and night. Over the years I have seen a change in their attitudes and now the patrol officers belong to a union. Most of the time employees join a union because they can't work out a reasonable working relationship with their boss, the police chief, or with their employer, the City of Woodstock. What I see now is a group of Sergeants that in the recent past would never have thought about joining a union but now they are rolling the idea about in their minds and wondering if it might be the right time to consider it for one's own self protection and job security. I don't know which way it will go but I do know this; the City better start to think about the issue and how to improved its relationship with them. Once you loose their trust it takes a long time to gain it back and they are the City's front-line ambassadors to the citizens of Woodstock, the County and the Country. It would behove you to pay serious consideration to their concerns.

Chief Robert W. Lowen v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners & Sgt. Gorski

Following the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners decision (on Jan. 4, 2008) to hear the Motion for a Directed Verdict asked for by the Sgt's attorney and then deciding in Sgt. Gorski's favor unanimously, 3 to 0, the Chief of Police, as Plaintiff, filed for an Administrative Review with the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court in Woodstock. The paper work was as one would expect prepared by the City's taxpayer paid attorneys.

The rationality behind such a Motion seems totally irrational to me unless they want to just delay the inevitable. The only other reason for pursuing such a course of action could be a "turf battle" between the office of the Mayor, the City Council, the office of the City Manager, the office of the Director of Human Resources and the City's own Board of Fire and Police Commissioners and to continue to financially and emotionally squeeze dry Sergeant Gorski.

So what we have now is the Chief of Police Robert W. Lowen with the assistance of taxpayer paid attorneys summoning the entire Board of Fire and Police Commissioners and Sgt. Gorski to the hearing before Judge McIntyre of the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court in Woodstock. I wonder who along the chain of the City's government gave the Police Chief permission to pursue this frivolous and costly course. Maybe, but I doubt it, we will someday find out. I am sure they will invoke the decision to invoke the "executive session" get out of jail free card to protect that identity or identities.

1.7G.3: FUNCTIONS OF CHIEF OF POLICE: states in part the

"The Chief of Police shall have the following duties:

A. The Chief of Police shall be the chief executive officer of the Police Department of the City. He shall seek the enforcement of all laws of the State and the City, as well as the enforcement of all orders, rules and regulations of the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners....

B. The Chief of Police shall be in charge of and exercise control over all sworn officers and civilian employee of the Police Department, subject to the authority of the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners and the City Manager.

So we have a situation here where the Chief of Police did not follow the orders of the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners. I don't believe that he would pursue such a reckless action unless someone up-line in City Government advised him to do so. I just hope the the Chief has this up-line order "in writing" to protect his actions in this regard.

In conclusion we have the City v. the City involved in a frivolous cause and using hard earned taxpayer dollars to sooth their egos or whatever is going on. What's your guess?